Which principle allows for fairness and justice in the decision-making process of assemblies?

The principle that allows for fairness and justice in the decision-making process of assemblies is rooted in the concept of impartiality, which is best captured by the notion of "partiality to none." This principle emphasizes that decisions should be made without favoritism or bias towards any individual or group, ensuring that all voices are heard and considered equally. By adhering to this principle, assemblies can foster an environment where every member feels that their opinions and interests are respected, leading to more equitable outcomes.

When a decision-making body operates under the idea of partiality to none, it creates a framework where deliberations are open, transparent, and inclusive. This enhances trust among members and promotes a culture of collaboration, ultimately validating the legitimacy of the assembly's decisions. Fairness and justice are crucial not just for the integrity of the process, but also for maintaining morale and cooperation among members.

In contrast, other principles such as the mandate of the chairman, the right of the minority, and the rule of majority, while important in their own contexts, do not inherently guarantee fairness and justice in the same comprehensive way. The mandate of the chairman often involves authority given to a single individual, which can lead to potential bias. The rule of majority can sometimes overshadow minority opinions, leading